Download Contact (.vcf)
Los Angeles Direct: 310.312.4322 General: 310.312.4000 Fax: 310.312.4224
New York University School of Law, J.D., 1994.
University of Pennsylvania, B.A., 1990.
Adam Pines is a seasoned litigator with more than two decades of courtroom experience. Drawing on his background in complex commercial litigation, including intellectual property, real estate and class action litigation, he specializes in trust and estate litigation. He represents trustees, beneficiaries, institutional clients and individuals in litigation and negotiated settlements regarding wills, trusts, conservatorships and intestate succession.
Mr. Pines has handled several trials and has experience in all phases of litigation, including provisional remedies, trials, appeals and complex settlements in both state and federal courts, and before arbitrators and regulators across the country.
Recent representative cases include prosecuting an action against an embezzling cotrustee, defending a trustee against claims arising out of an allegedly imprudent investment, and representing a decedent's wife in litigation with her stepchildren regarding the validity of the decedent’s last trust.
Mr. Pines handles every matter according to its unique context and circumstances, prepared to litigate aggressively where necessary, but also keeping the representation focused on a fair and efficient resolution that allows the parties to move on with their lives.
Second Wife v. Stepsons – Represented decedent’s second wife of 29 years in challenge brought by her stepsons to trust amendment executed by decedent two weeks before his diagnosis with a brain tumor. Stepsons’ petition alleged decedent’s incapacity and elder abuse by client. Prosecuted actions to dissolve family business and defended against petition to invalidate trust amendment. Case settled on favorable terms.
Beneficiary v. Trustee – Defended trustee against claims by a beneficiary of an imprudent investment in a real estate limited partnership. Brought cross-petition to establish that settlor should be held responsible for the investment decision under the doctrine of trustee de son tort.
Trustee v. Trustee – Prosecuted action against cotrustee and codirector of charitable foundation for mishandling of trust assets and to remove him from his positions of authority. Case settled on favorable terms, including respondent’s withdrawal from foundation.
Angela Wilder v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., et al. – Defended motion picture studio against claims of idea theft brought by plaintiff who pitched an idea to Sony that she claims was similar to The Talk, which was produced by CBS approximately one year later. Plaintiff dismissed her claims on the eve of trial with no payment from Sony.
Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corporation, 110 Cal. App. 4th 1658, 3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 279 (2003) – Successfully defended defense contractor against competitor and former joint venturer’s claims of trade secret misappropriation. Successfully opposed motion for preliminary injunction, took and defended twenty-two depositions and second-chaired seven week jury trial to defense verdict. Verdict affirmed on appeal.
Melissa Lopez v. City of Burbank – On a pro bono basis, represented Burbank resident in connection with her application to operate a large family day care home in her residence, as permitted by state law. Appeared before Burbank Planning Commission and City Council and prosecuted successful action for administrative mandate. Collected costs from the City of Burbank.
Newgard v. Park Place Entertainment – Participated in the defense of Las Vegas casino against claims of false arrest and wrongful imprisonment based on casino’s referral of Plaintiff for prosecution for issuing gaming markers without sufficient funds. Case dismissed after federal Court ruled as a matter of first impression that markers constituted checks under Nevada Penal Code.
Francine Browner & Neil Afromsky v. Max Azria, Francine Browner, Inc., et al. – Prosecuted action for fraudulent transfers and insider preferences against clothing designer Max Azria and his companies (BCBG Clothing), based on Defendants’ receipt of all assets of Francine Browner, Inc. shortly before judgment was entered against the company. Obtained significant settlement.
Jamba Juice v. Z-Juice – Prosecuted action for breach of contract and trademark infringement against former franchisees that failed to de-identify stores following termination of franchise agreements. Defendants stipulated to permanent injunctions following filing of motions for preliminary injunction.
Ultramar, Inc. v. Clark, et al. – Prosecuted action for contribution to costs of cleaning diesel contamination under former truck stop. Conducted comprehensive investigation and successfully opposed defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Defendants agreed to multi-million dollar settlement prior to trial.
Dole Foods v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al. – Prosecuted action to force Pacific Maritime Association and its members to allow Dole to remove from the Port of Los Angeles produce and refrigeration equipment stranded by the PMA’s lockout of Port workers. Prepared state and then federal TRO papers on 24-hours’ notice and conducted evidentiary hearing in federal court. Port re-opened under Taft-Hartley Act prior to appeal of courts’ denials of relief.
Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. adv. Eugene L. Froelich – Prosecuted action to collect on former executive’s unpaid $3 million promissory note. Obtained summary judgment on complaint and defendant’s cross-complaint. Successfully defended appeal and collected full amount of judgment. Also successfully demurred to former executive’s shareholders’ derivative suit and obtained summary judgment on former executive’s ERISA complaint.
Listed in Best Lawyers in America, 2014-2016.
Recognized as a Southern California Super Lawyer, 2012-2013.
"Rising Star under 40" by Southern California Super Lawyers Magazine, 2004-2008.
Recipient of California State Bar’s Wiley W. Manuel Pro Bono Services Award for distinguished public service, 1997.
Admitted to practice in all courts in California, as well as the United States District Courts for the Northern, Eastern, Central and Southern Districts of California, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court.
Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office; Trial Advocacy Program (TAP) training, Oct.-Nov. 1998; Trial Attorney, February 1999.
Board Member, California Lexington Group.
Member, Century City and Los Angeles County Bar Associations.
© 2016 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP. All rights reserved.