• 06.24.19

    California Court Denies Class Certification in ‘Wrong Number’ Case

    A California federal court judge refused to certify a class of plaintiffs in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) lawsuit against Citibank, determining that individualized issues of consent would predominate in a case where the class definition excluded the plaintiff himself.

  • 06.24.19

    Lawmakers Push Robocall Legislation

    Anti-robocall legislation continues to move forward at both the federal and state levels, with the TRACED Act easing through the U.S. Senate by an overwhelming majority and a similar bill making its way through the California Legislature.

  • 06.24.19

    FTC Hangs Up on ‘Massive’ Robocaller Action

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) put an end to the litigation in the “Pointbreak Media” robocall case, an action filed by the agency in 2018 against multiple individual and corporate defendants that operated a telemarketing scam.

  • 06.24.19

    Court Finds Plaintiff’s ATDS Allegations Sufficient to Move Forward

    A Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) plaintiff managed to survive the defendant’s motion to dismiss after the court found sufficient factual allegations in the complaint that the defendant used an automated telephone dialing system (ATDS).

  • 06.24.19

    Communications Decency Act Does Not Bar TCPA Claims Against Providers of Telemarketing Services

    A Wisconsin federal court has held, in Cunningham v. Montes, that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) does not preclude claims asserted against providers of telemarketing services under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

  • 06.24.19

    Ninth Circuit Follows Fourth Circuit in Finding TCPA ‘Debt Collection’ Exemption Unconstitutional

    Adding more fuel to an already raging fire, the Ninth Circuit has weighed in on a case that has the potential to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court and finally provide much-needed guidance on the controversial Marks case as well as the constitutionality of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ...

  • 06.24.19

    Manatt’s Continuing Coverage of Significant Post-ACA International Developments

    Well over a year has passed since the ACA International (ACA) decision from the D.C. Circuit changed the face of litigation in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) world by striking down the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) 2015 automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) ...

  • 06.24.19

    Supreme Court Leaves Unanswered Whether District Courts Must Defer to FCC’s Interpretations

    On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court remanded for consideration to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit two preliminary questions antecedent to the main issue of whether federal district courts must defer to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) interpretations of the Telephone ...

  • 05.22.19

    Supreme Court Considers, Rejects TCPA Cases

    In U.S. Supreme Court news, the justices heard oral argument in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case with broad implications and denied certiorari in an appeal of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) stance that the use of soundboard technology constitutes a robocall.

  • 05.22.19

    Question of ‘Sender’ One for the Jury

    A New York federal court has adopted the multifactor test favored by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth and Eleventh Circuits to determine whether a defendant is the “sender” of a fax for purposes of Telephone Consumer Protection Act liability.



pursuant to New York DR 2-101(f)

© 2023 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.

All rights reserved