• 05.01.23

    DNC Policy Trips Up TCPA Defendant

    A Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) defendant’s do not call (DNC) policy was not enough to avoid potential TCPA liability, an Illinois federal court recently held.

  • 05.01.23

    Texts Seeking Real Estate Leads Don’t Constitute TCPA Solicitations

    Text messages sent to generate real estate sales leads did not qualify as telephone solicitations under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (TCPA) regulations, according to a Texas federal court decision.

  • 05.01.23

    Eleventh Circuit Agrees to Rehear Notable Decision

    The Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to an en banc review of a notable decision issued last July with respect to Article III standing for purposes of a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) lawsuit.

  • 04.11.23

    Post-Facebook v. Duguid Litigation Roundup

    A summary of some recent noteworthy district-level decisions applying and interpreting Facebook follows.

  • 11.21.22

    New York Court Certifies Two Classes in TCPA Class Action

    Certifying two classes in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action, a New York federal court found that questions of individualized consent did not predominate and that the plaintiffs did not need to demonstrate that they personally registered their numbers on the National Do Not Call ...

  • 11.21.22

    Wrong Number Suit Moves Forward in California

    A Telephone Consumer Protection Act defendant couldn’t hang its hat on the argument that it accidentally texted the wrong number, a California federal court recently held.

  • 11.21.22

    Oklahoma’s Mini-TCPA Takes Effect

    The potential for liability for callers has increased yet again, with Oklahoma’s Telephone Solicitation Act  taking effect as of November 1.

  • 08.31.22

    Court Enforces Arbitration Provision in TCPA Suit

    A Michigan federal court upheld an arbitration clause found on a lead generation website, granting a defendant’s motion to dismiss a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case.

  • 08.31.22

    Contract Termination Doesn’t End EBR for TCPA Purposes

    The termination of a contract didn’t end the established business relationship between a consumer and the provider of a vehicle service agreement, according to a New Jersey district court.

  • 08.31.22

    Mother Can’t Sue on Behalf of Minor Son, California Court Holds

    A mother lacked standing to file a Telephone Consumer Protection Act suit on behalf of her minor son, a California federal court recently held, granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

manatt-black

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

pursuant to New York DR 2-101(f)

© 2023 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.

All rights reserved