Quoted, “Providers seeking resolution of billing dispute sunder the No Surprises Act cause a major backlog of cases,” STAT, December 30, 2022.
Co-author, “What Creditors and Medical Services Providers Need to Know About D.C.’s Amended Debt Collection Law,” insideARM, November 17, 2022.
Quoted, “Surprise billing compliance 'very daunting,' regulatory experts say,” Healthcare Dive, April 7, 2022.
Quoted, “Buckle Up: Wild Ride Awaits Health, Life Sci Policy In 2022,” Law360, January 3, 2022.
Quoted, “Stakeholders Still Square Off, Lawsuits Continue Over Surprise Billing Rules,” InsideHealthPolicy, December 8, 2021.
Quoted, “What Revenue Cycle Can Do to Prepare for Surprise Billing Compliance,” RevCycleIntelligence, August 5, 2021.
Quoted, “5 Things Rev Cycle Leaders Need To Know About the Surprise Billing Interim Final Rule,” HealthLeaders, July 9, 2021.
Quoted, “The Pandemic’s CRE Domino Effect,” American Banker, June 10, 2020.
Co-author, “IRC § 501 (r) Developments and the Importance of Compliance Programs,” insideARM, December 1, 2016.
Court Finds a Fiduciary Risk for Directed Pension Trustees, The American Banker, December 1, 2003.
Cash Balance Plans Under Fire, In-House California, Autumn 2003, with Donald W. Meaders. Analysis of the decision in Cooper v. IBM, which invalidated IBM’s $37 billion cash balance plan.
"Patient Privacy," Daily Journal, January 26, 2001. Analysis of federal health care privacy regulations issued pursuant to the HIPAA.
Mixed Manna, Daily Journal, September 15, 2000, with Barry Landsberg. Analysis of California’s broad statutory unfair competition law.
Note, Due Process: Accuracy or Opportunity?, Southern California Law Review (September, 1992). An extensive analysis of the due process implications of proposals to reform mass tort litigation including an analysis of the due process issues in class actions and the history of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.
Introduction, Southern California Law Review Special Supplement "Reactions to the Thomas Confirmation Hearings." (January, 1992). Special volume containing the reactions of scholars across the nation to the confirmation process for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.