Manatt Files Amicus Brief in State Election Laws Case Before the Supreme Court

A Manatt team led by Nathaniel Bach and including Matthew Bruno and Tina Lapsia filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Moore v. Harper on behalf of and in collaboration with leading election-law expert UCLA Law Professor Richard L. Hasen. Manatt and Hasen’s brief highlights the major implications this case may have on voting rights, arguing that accepting the so-called “independent state legislature” theory advanced by petitioners would result in a flood of new federal election litigation and a legitimacy crisis for the federal judiciary, potentially paving the way for election subversion.

Moore v. Harper centers around whether the North Carolina Supreme Court has the authority to strike down a gerrymandered congressional map as violating the state constitution. Should the Court accept petitioner’s “independent state legislature” theory, it could end the ability of state courts to interpret their own state’s election laws as applied to federal elections.  

In the amicus brief, Manatt and Hasen argue against petitioners’ theory, noting that state legislatures alone cannot “regulate” federal elections because there is so much detail for conducting elections simply absent from statutory text, and interpretation by state election administrators and state courts is routine and necessary.  The brief discusses the recent upswing of election-related cases on the Supreme Court’s emergency docket and discusses how this case could open the floodgates for new litigation related to the interpretation of state election laws on numerous election-related matters, including early voting, absentee voting, mail-in balloting, electioneering, redistricting, and the mechanics of normal election administration. “In other words, Petitioners’ theory would invent an entirely new constitutional cause of action, significantly burdening federal courts,” the brief states.  

Access Manatt’s complete amicus brief here.  

For additional information, read a Slate article coauthored by Bach on this case here



pursuant to New York DR 2-101(f)

© 2023 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.

All rights reserved